A v United Kingdom [2002] All ER (D) 264 (Dec)

The case A v United Kingdom [2002] All ER (D) 264 (Dec) was a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) by a woman who claimed that her right of access to court was violated by the absence of legal aid to challenge a defamatory statement made about her in Parliament¹. The statement was made by a Member of Parliament (MP) who accused her of being involved in a fraud scheme. The statement was protected by the absolute parliamentary privilege, which means that MPs cannot be sued for anything they say in Parliament.

The ECHR held that the right of access to court was not absolute, but may be subject to limitations, as long as they do not impair the very essence of the right¹. The court also recognized that the parliamentary privilege was within the margin of appreciation enjoyed by the United Kingdom, and that it served a legitimate aim of protecting the freedom of Parliament¹. The court noted that the applicant was not left entirely without remedy, as she could have sought limited legal advice or a conditional fee arrangement¹. Therefore, the court found no violation of Article 6 (1) of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to a fair trial.

The relevance of the case is that it illustrates the balance between the right of access to court and the parliamentary privilege, and the role of the ECHR in reviewing the limitations imposed by the national authorities on this right. The case also shows the importance of legal aid and alternative funding mechanisms for ensuring effective access to justice for individuals who cannot afford legal representation. The case is cited by other cases that deal with similar issues, such as defamation, human rights, and constitutional law²³.



(1) A v The United Kingdom: ECHR 17 Dec 2002 – swarb.co.uk. https://swarb.co.uk/a-v-the-united-kingdom-ECHR-17-Dec-2002/.
(2) PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES – SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3789181_code2983901.pdf?abstractid=3789181&mirid=1.
(3) BAILII – BAILII OpenLaw – Immigration and Asylum. https://www.bailii.org/openlaw/immigration_and_asylum.html.

Published by Law Author

**Welcome to Law Author!** At Law Author, we believe in the power of knowledge and the value of time. Our mission is to simplify your learning experience by providing concise and insightful note summaries sourced from reputable materials. Whether you're a student looking to grasp complex concepts quickly or a professional aiming to stay informed, our carefully crafted summaries are designed to assist you on your learning journey. *What Sets Us Apart: • Reliable Sources: Our note summaries are derived from credible and established sources, ensuring accuracy and reliability. • Convenience: Save time and effort by accessing condensed, easy-to-understand summaries of important topics. • Comprehensive Coverage: We cover a wide range of subjects, catering to diverse interests and educational needs. *Why Choose Us: • Expertly Curated Content: Our team of knowledgeable experts carefully curates each summary to provide you with the most relevant and essential information. • User-Friendly Interface: Navigate our website effortlessly and find the summaries you need with our intuitive interface. • Constant Updates: Stay up-to-date with the latest developments in various fields through our regularly updated content. Join us in the pursuit of knowledge and make learning more accessible than ever. Explore our note summaries and embark on a journey of continuous learning. Thank you for visiting Law Author!

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started