Abdulai III v The Republic [1989-90] 1 GLR; 348, CA

  • The case was an appeal from a conviction for contempt of court, which was an offence under section 226 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1960 (Act 30)¹.
  • The appellant, Abdulai III, was the chief of Bole and a defendant in a civil suit concerning a land dispute. He was ordered by the High Court to produce certain documents relating to the land, but he failed to do so. He also failed to appear in court on several occasions, despite being duly served with summons¹².
  • The High Court, per Aikins J., found him guilty of contempt of court and sentenced him to six months’ imprisonment. The court held that the appellant had deliberately disobeyed the court’s orders and shown disrespect to the administration of justice¹².
  • The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal, arguing that he had not been given a fair trial and that the sentence was excessive. He also claimed that he had not received the summons and that he had valid reasons for not producing the documents¹².
  • The Court of Appeal, per Wiredu JA, dismissed the appeal and affirmed the conviction and sentence. The court held that the appellant had been given ample opportunity to defend himself and that there was sufficient evidence to prove his contempt. The court also held that the sentence was appropriate, considering the gravity of the offence and the need to uphold the dignity and authority of the court¹².
  • The relevance of the case is that it shows how the legal system in Ghana deals with the issue of contempt of court, which is a serious offence that undermines the rule of law and the administration of justice. It also illustrates how the courts exercise their discretion in imposing sanctions for contempt, taking into account the circumstances of each case³.


(1) FRANCIS DEMU @ DIESEL, FULANI ABDULAI V. THE REPUBLIC. https://lite.judy.legal/amp/case/francis-demu-diesel-fulani-abdulai-v-the-republic-6f53.
(2) Abudulai Mohammed v. THE Republic – [1971] 1 G.L. 191 … – Studocu. https://www.studocu.com/row/document/ghana-institute-of-management-and-public-administration/law/abudulai-mohammed-v-the-republic/26109441.
(3) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE SUPREME COURT ACCRA … – GHALII. https://media.ghalii.org/files/judgments/ghasc/2011/13/2011-ghasc-13_0.pdf.
(4) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE – GHALII. https://media.ghalii.org/files/judgments/ghasc/2011/2/2011-ghasc-2.pdf.

Published by Law Author

**Welcome to Law Author!** At Law Author, we believe in the power of knowledge and the value of time. Our mission is to simplify your learning experience by providing concise and insightful note summaries sourced from reputable materials. Whether you're a student looking to grasp complex concepts quickly or a professional aiming to stay informed, our carefully crafted summaries are designed to assist you on your learning journey. *What Sets Us Apart: • Reliable Sources: Our note summaries are derived from credible and established sources, ensuring accuracy and reliability. • Convenience: Save time and effort by accessing condensed, easy-to-understand summaries of important topics. • Comprehensive Coverage: We cover a wide range of subjects, catering to diverse interests and educational needs. *Why Choose Us: • Expertly Curated Content: Our team of knowledgeable experts carefully curates each summary to provide you with the most relevant and essential information. • User-Friendly Interface: Navigate our website effortlessly and find the summaries you need with our intuitive interface. • Constant Updates: Stay up-to-date with the latest developments in various fields through our regularly updated content. Join us in the pursuit of knowledge and make learning more accessible than ever. Explore our note summaries and embark on a journey of continuous learning. Thank you for visiting Law Author!

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started